The first case analysis CASE ANALYSIS NO.1
(TYPICAL CASE FOR SUBCLASS 188 BUSINESS INNOVATION APPLICATIONS)

Basic information of the main applicant:
39 years old, with spouse and son, the main applicant and his spouse operate a factory selling environmental protection equipment and environmental investigation in China

Visa application:
Late August 2013 Submission of intent applications
Early September 2013 Submission of Continental Government Guarantee Application
Mid-September 2013 Secured by the Government
In mid-September 2013, Immigration Department invited to submit visa application
Visa application submitted on November 13, 2013
Early March 2014
Late March 2014 Immigration Officer Requests Additional Materials
In May 2014, the Immigration Bureau issued an invitation to pay English training fees
May 23, 2014 Family members get ordinary business investment visa

The difficulty in this case is the interpretation of the source of funds, as the applicant and his spouse paid only a small amount of personal income tax. Another difficulty in this case was that the applicant's child was studying in Australia. So, the main applicant

Accompanying study in Australia, the secondary applicant manages the plant in China. However, immigration law requires the main applicant to be directly involved in the management of the company. After a large number of similar cases and preliminary preparations, lawyer Liu Fengwei agreed in the law

Under the premise of the promise, technically guide customers to prepare materials. Due to the clear thinking, the logic and persuasiveness of the application scheme, and the adequate preparation of materials, the USCIS rarely approved the visa directly without interviewing the client.

Certificate application. The applicant's family of three has been granted a four-year ordinary business investment visa.